This report covers the nuclear safety related inspection of Wylfa power station undertaken as part of a series of interventions including those listed in the Integrated Intervention Strategy (IIS) plan, inspections deemed necessary to cover emergent work, and follow-up of matters carried forward from previous visits.
This intervention included planned compliance inspections against the following Licence Conditions (LCs):
Licence Conditions 10, 23, 24, 27, 28 & 34 were covered as part of a safety system inspection of the Secondary Dry Storage Cells and the Diverse Discharge Route (SDSC/DDR).
Three incidents on the site notified to ONR under the licensee’s arrangements were followed-up during the visit.
Other matters of a routine nature that are deemed unlikely to have a significant effect on nuclear safety at the present time, and which are being addressed routinely under the licensee’s arrangements, were also covered during the inspections.
From the inspection, I judge that overall the SDSC/DDR safety system provisions meet the requirements of the safety case and are adequate.
A safety system inspection of the SDSC/DDR was carried out as part of the programme of safety system inspections included on the Wylfa site intervention plan for 2014/15, to identify the adequacy of the station arrangements made to ensure the system will perform its safety function. In deciding if suitable and sufficient measures have been put in place for the safety system, these inspections consider compliance with a number of licence conditions to test the adequacy of the arrangements implemented. The standard consideration of licence conditions during safety system inspections includes LCs 10, 23, 24, 27, 28 & 34, with conditions added or excluded depending on their applicability.
The system inspection found that the licensee has made arrangements to ensure that the SDSC/DDR is maintained and operated in accordance with its safety case, and that on the basis of the inspection sample the arrangements are deemed to be implemented in an adequate manner. Therefore, we have given an inspection rating 3 (adequate) in respect of the LCs inspected, and also judged that overall the system meets the requirements of its safety case and is adequate. During the inspection, opportunities for improvement were identified that station has agreed to address, and ONR will monitor the action they take during routine inspections at the site.
Station notified ONR of three events under the arrangements for reporting incidents on the site, where it was necessary for them to take corrective action to address shortfalls in the implementation of their local compliance arrangements. Two of the events involved instances of not providing sufficient authorised staff to perform roles specified within the station emergency arrangements. On becoming aware of the circumstances, they took steps to address the shortfall and restore compliance with the arrangements. During the time that the roles were not fully supported, it was not necessary to implement the emergency arrangements. The remaining event involved an operations technician detected as having radioactive contamination present on his person at the inner security area exit monitors. The contamination was removed by the technician washing himself in a facility that drains into the active effluent treatment plant. They are investigating these incidents, and will keep ONR informed of the outcome from their further work using the routine arrangements in place for following up events. In each case the licensee responded appropriately to the adverse circumstances and took corrective action. However, each event involved non-compliance with local arrangements made in the interests of safety, and so we have given an inspection rating of 4 (below standard) to these events, and ONR will monitor the licensee’s follow-up to these events.
During the intervention visit, opportunity was taken to inspect station’s response to matters arising on the site, including those notified to ONR, and I consider that the inspections carried-out confirm that they have responded adequately to emergent plant conditions. On the basis of the inspections undertaken, I judge that they have complied with licence condition arrangements in relation to emergent work, which has arisen since the previous inspection at Wylfa power station.
The intervention was performed in line with ONR’s guidance requirements (as described in our technical inspection guides) in the areas inspected.
From the information gathered and evidence obtained during this intervention, no matters have been identified that are likely to have an adverse impact on nuclear safety on the station that are not being addressed. Therefore, I consider that no additional regulatory action arising from this visit is necessary currently, and the interventions for Wylfa power station should continue to be implemented as set out in the Integrated Intervention Strategy. I judge the corrective action taken by station in response to emergent matters to be appropriate in the prevailing circumstances. The outcome from the inspections has been captured within the station event and action tracking arrangements, in the actions recorded in this intervention report, and in the ONR issues database, as appropriate.