Office for Nuclear Regulation

This website uses non-intrusive cookies to improve your user experience. You can visit our cookie privacy page for more information.

To conduct a system inspection, attend a Level 4 meeting and undertake routine regulatory interactions with Sellafield Limited

Executive summary

Purpose of intervention

This intervention was undertaken on 21 - 24 July 2014 at Sellafield Limited's Sellafield nuclear licensed site in Cumbria.

One of the strategic objectives of Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) is to undertake a coordinated programme of safety related compliance inspections on nuclear licensed sites in relation to arrangements for compliance with the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (HSWA'74) and the Energy Act 2013 (TEA'13). The Nuclear Installations Act 1965 (NIA'65) is a key Relevant Statutory Provision of TEA'13 that provides for a nuclear site licence to be granted to a named corporate body to install or operate specified nuclear installations in a defined location. NIA'65 requires ONR to attach to each nuclear site licence such conditions as it considers necessary or desirable in the interests of safety or with respect to the handling, treatment and disposal of nuclear matter.

Inspection of Licence Condition (LC) compliance at nuclear licensed sites is an important part of ONR's activities. ONR's Sellafield Programme has defined a programme of system inspections and LC compliance inspections that focuses on those parts of the site and activities where the risk or hazards are most significant. The system inspection carried out within this intervention forms part of that programme.

Interventions Carried Out by ONR

The intervention comprised:

The system inspection sought to determine whether the Magnox Reprocessing Plant plutonium purification cycle solvent and reagent system meets the requirements of the safety case and is adequate. The implementation of the Licensee's arrangements for the following LCs were tested during the system inspection:

ONR routinely engages with Licensees formally and informally in order to undertake its regulatory duties efficiently and effectively. During this intervention I engaged with the Licensee formally (at a Level 4 meeting) and informally (at an update meeting and an information exchange session).

Explanation of Judgement if Safety System Not Judged to be Adequate

The solvent and reagent system of the Magnox Reprocessing Plant plutonium purification cycle was judged to be adequate.

Key Findings, Inspector's Opinions and Reasons for Judgements Made

For the solvent and reagent system of the plutonium purification (PP) cycle of the Magnox Reprocessing Plant I judged the following IIS ratings to be appropriate:

Overall, I judged that the Licensee has appropriate plant and arrangements in place and available to ensure that the solvents and reagents entering the PP cycle of the Magnox Reprocessing Plant are consistent with the defined specifications. Based on this system inspection, I conclude the system meets the requirements of the safety case and is adequate.

The Licensee provided evidence of progress against the Glovebox Improvement Programme that is ongoing within the Magnox Reprocessing Plant. Based on the evidence provided, I am satisfied that the condition of the gloveboxes that have been subject to the improvement programme represent a significant improvement relative to their original condition, moving closer to Relevant Good Practice. I requested the Licensee's own site inspection function to undertake an inspection (including a plant walk down) of the completed gloveboxes and to provide a report to me summarising the findings. The Licensee's own site inspection function will continue to monitor progress against the improvement programme to completion, providing progress statements to me if requested.

ONR routinely exchanges information with Licensees. In this instance the exchange included discussions on an event report and an interaction with a safety representative.

Conclusion of Intervention

One action was placed as a result of this intervention, which was completed by the Licensee prior to this report being issued. I brought a number of conventional safety issues to the Licensee's attention which I will follow up as part of my normal regulatory interaction with the Licensee. Based on the evidence gathered, no significant matters have been identified that are likely to impact on nuclear safety on the Sellafield site at this time.