Office for Nuclear Regulation

This website uses non-intrusive cookies to improve your user experience. You can visit our cookie privacy page for more information.

Fire safety inspection at Springfields Nuclear Fuels

Executive summary

Purpose of intervention

I conducted an inspection of fire safety at Springfields Nuclear Fuels Ltd. The inspection focused on the themes of fire safety management and practical fire safety provision. A number of issues from previous fire safety inspections were reviewed to confirm that adequate consideration had been given to them by the Licensee. I completed a tour of the selected facilities before concluding with a final meeting with principal management. The inspection identified a number of areas of industry good practice along with a several areas for the licensee to address; these are reported in items 2.1 – 2.11 below.

Generally the fire safety arrangements were Below Standard.

Purpose of Intervention

The purpose of the planned inspection was to ensure that the Licensee was showing compliance with the requirements of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. The inspection focused on both the management of fire safety and the practical fire safety provision within building [redacted] I conducted a meeting to assess the approach being taken to the management of fire safety, testing and maintenance of the fire safety systems across the site. The legislation relating to this inspection focuses on life fire safety not nuclear fire safety issues. I notified the Head of EPP&R of the themes and areas I intended to inspect and requested him to provide pre-audit material to assist in the process; the material was provided to me in a timely fashion.

Interventions Carried Out by ONR

The site gave access throughout the day to senior managers and subject area experts. Accompanying me throughout the inspection was the Head of EPP&R, the Fire Safety Officer (FSO), the Emergency Planning Manager (EPM) and [redacted]. These persons were able to provide answers to questions and provide evidence of the sites’ fire safety arrangements.

During my inspection, I challenged those accompanying me, and others about procedures and approaches to the practical application of maintaining adequate fire safety provision. In particular detailed conversations were had regarding the current level of automatic fire detection (AFD) currently provided within [redacted] and the reliance placed on AFD by the fire engineered fire strategy. I questioned personnel to test effectiveness and knowledge of arrangements. I examined a series of documents prior to my arrival on site. Part of the day included discussions as to the maintenance and prioritisation of defects relating to fire safety systems and the application of the findings and expectations of Fire Risk Assessments (FRA). This was followed by a walk through a selection of the areas of the building mentioned in 1.1 above.

I was provided with a clear indication from all of those persons I met that a positive culture of openness exists, and a willingness to learn and improve is present within the safety environment.

Explanation of Judgement if Safety System Not Judged to be Adequate

Not Applicable

Key Findings, Inspector's Opinions and Reasons for Judgements Made

Key findings

My overall impression was one of a management team which adequately demonstrated a desire to ensure that fire safety is taken seriously and is given the due consideration it deserves.

During both the walk down and the meetings held during the day I did identify one significant shortfall and a number of minor shortfalls with the application of the expected fire safety strategy. I also identified a number of examples of industry good practice. I was particularly impressed with the quality of the FRA that is carried out by Springfield’s staff.

Inspectors opinions

I am of the opinion that the Springfield’s Nuclear Fuels Ltd Management Team displayed a positive appreciation of the importance of effective fire safety measures within the facilities and that they demonstrate a positive approach to achieving compliance with the relevant legislation.

Reasons for judgements made

The inspection involved a combination of looking into the management of fire safety, reviewing the content of the building FRA and physically walking through selected areas of [redacted] and speaking with staff. I questioned and challenged observations with the Springfield’s FSO and others that I met during the course of the day.

Although the inspection identified a number of areas for improvement and consideration by the site management, the overarching impression was one of a suitable direction of travel being implemented and a high level of importance being placed on the provision of the required standards for conventional fire safety arrangements.

Conclusion of Intervention

I concluded with an assessment of compliance with the legislation, and presented deficiencies and recognised areas of good practice at a wash-up meeting with members of the Springfield’s Management Team.

Overall my findings in relation to the areas I inspected, demonstrated that there is a need to act on the findings of the FRA, particularly in relation to the AFD provision within this building. The site management understand that in order for the fire safety systems that are in place at Springfield’s to do their job adequately, it is imperative that all members of staff are fully conversant with the important role that they play in the fire safety strategy. The role of the FSO and Fire Nominated Persons (FNP) is a key aspect of achieving this. I identified a number of areas for improvement / development which have been taken on board by the licensee and will be followed up as part of the post inspection process.