The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) undertakes all regulatory interactions with Sellafield Limited (SL), the site licensee, against a strategy defined by the ONR Sellafield Programme. The planned inspection schedule for the current regulatory year (covering April 2015 – March 2016), the content of which is guided by that strategy, identifies the Licence Conditions (LCs) that will be inspected over this period.
This planned intervention was undertaken to determine if the Infrastructure organisation is adequately implementing SL’s site-wide arrangements for compliance with Licence Condition 25 (Operational records). The intervention targeted the implementation of Sellafield’s arrangements within the Analytical Services Laboratory on the Sellafield site. This laboratory provides analytical services to other facilities across the site, receiving samples for assessment and characterisation on a routine basis. The work of the facility is important to ensuring that these other facilities remain within their safe operating envelopes, as well as characterising wastes associated with hazard and risk reduction activities across the site. In addition, the Analytical Services facility, which comprises a number of laboratories, contains a significant radioactive inventory within its cells, gloveboxes, and fumehoods. The facility also contains legacy waste which is subject to a disposal programme under regulatory oversight. The adequacy of facility operational records is therefore important to ensuring nuclear safety on the licensed site.
Licence Condition 25 (LC 25) requires the licensee to ensure that adequate records are made of the operation, inspection and maintenance of any plant which may affect safety. My inspection, which comprised discussions with SL staff and examination of plant documentation and the inspection of relevant facilities, focussed on the following areas:
Not applicable; this was not a Safety System inspection.
I consider the facility’s implementation of the site’s arrangements for LC 25 is good in many areas. For instance, there was good evidence in relation to operational records relating to compliance with safety case documentation. This is, however, offset by the shortcomings identified; specifically in relation to the adequacy of the arrangements for providing access rights to the Laboratory Information Management System, and the availability of the associated training records. For these reasons, on balance, I consider an IIS rating of 3 (Adequate) is merited against LC 25 as a result of this inspection.
My findings were shared with, and accepted by, the licensee as part of normal inspection feedback. I have raised no Regulatory Issues as a result of this inspection.